- Values (the labels)
- Values are the labels for what is important to a person. They sit underneath behavior and most of the time stay below conscious attention. The man doesn't think about his value of integrity before deciding whether to keep his word; the value runs the decision, and the decision shows up as behavior. Leaders who try to change behavior without touching the underlying value get short-term compliance, not durable change.
- Highly Valued Criteria
- The top five-or-so values that actually drive a person's behavior in a given domain. The other values exist but are nice-to-have. The leadership implication: you don't need to know everything a brother values; you need to know his top five in the domain where you're working with him. "What is important to you about being a Mason?" gets at the Masonic Highly Valued Criteria directly.
- Behavior vs. value (the iceberg)
- The standard iceberg: behavior is the part above the waterline; values, beliefs, and identity are the bulk underneath. Leaders who only see the surface argue with behavior. Leaders who see the values argue with the iceberg. The Craft's working tools point at the same thing in different vocabulary: the rough ashlar is behavior; the perfect ashlar is values aligned with conduct.
- Toward / Away From motivation
- Two directions motivation runs. Toward motivation moves people toward something they want (a goal, an honor, a relationship). Away From motivation moves people away from something they fear (loss, rejection, pain). Both are legitimate, both produce action; the leadership move is to notice which direction your brother is running, because the same destination spoken in the wrong direction lands wrong. The academic frame for this is approach-avoidance motivation (Elliot & Covington 2001).
- Massey's developmental periods
- Morris Massey's published model (The People Puzzle, 1980) of when values get laid down: Imprint (0-7), Modeling (7-14), Socialization (14-21), Business Persona (21-35). The age ranges align roughly with Piaget's cognitive stages and Erikson's psychosocial stages. The leadership implication: a man's values were largely set by what was happening around him when he was younger than he can remember; arguing with them directly is usually wasted breath.
- Sources of values
- The published short list of where values come from: family, friends, church or religion, school, geography, economics, and media. A man raised in rural West Texas in 1962 will hold different values from a man raised in suburban New Jersey in 1995, and both will be unaware of how much of their values came from the air they breathed. The list isn't deterministic, but it's predictive.
- Elicitation question
- The short open question that gets at the highly-valued criteria in any domain: "What is important to you about ___?" Fill the blank with the domain you care about: Freemasonry, being an officer, your work, your family, this committee. Ask for the short answer first. The first reply (the one the unconscious mind hands you before the conscious mind dresses it up) is usually the cleanest data.
- Value systems (Spiral Dynamics)
- Beck and Cowan's Spiral Dynamics (1996), building on Clare Graves' research from the 1960s, describes whole patterns of value thinking that recur across people and across organizations. The simplified six labels used in Masonic leadership materials: Survival (the Individual), Tribal (the Chief), Aggression (the warrior), Hierarchy (the Book of Law), Materialistic (the Entrepreneur), and Group and Cause (the cause-driven advocate). The systems alternate between I-orientation (Survival, Aggression, Materialistic) and We-orientation (Tribal, Hierarchy, Group and Cause).
- I-orientation vs. We-orientation
- The alternating pattern in Spiral Dynamics: every other value system swings between an individualist orientation ("what's good for me") and a collectivist orientation ("what's good for us"). The pattern explains why a brother committed to the Lodge as a whole (We) and one focused on his own degree progress (I) can sit in the same room and not understand each other's priorities. Neither is wrong; they're operating from different systems.
- Self-determination's three needs
- From Deci and Ryan's published research: people are intrinsically motivated when three needs are met: autonomy (acting from their own will), competence (effectiveness in their work), and relatedness (connection to others). The leadership move is to design situations where the brother's autonomy, competence, and relatedness all rise together. When all three are met, you don't need to push; the man self-starts.